• Home
  • FAQs
  • Store
  • Legal
    • Court Decisions
    • State Legislation
    • Federal Legislation
  • Press Releases
  • Contact

Welcome to the EJCDC Blog


Keep up with the latest news and updates

October 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Effect on a third party of a settlement agreement between the project owner and a supplier of materials. Aggregate Construction, Inc., v. Aaron Swan & Associates, Inc. Supreme Court of South Dakota (2015), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

October 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Whether a company that collected field information about an electrical utility’s facilities was practicing surveying. Southeastern Reprographics, Inc., v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (2015), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

October 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Engineering firm’s duty to defend project owner against a claim based on design deficiencies. Penta Corporation v. Town of Newport. Superior Court, New Hampshire (2016), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

June 20, 2016

0

Court Decisions

Engineer’s exposure to contractor claims. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Rummel Klepper & Kahl,, LLP. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland (2016), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

June 20, 2016

0

Court Decisions

Exceptions to statute of repose. Miron v. MNI, Inc. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin (2016), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

June 20, 2016

0

Court Decisions

Engineering/Architecture firms’ exposure to liability for scaffold collapse. McKean v. Yates Engineering Corporation. Court of Appeals of Mississippi (2015),by Hugh Anderson

Read More

June 20, 2016

0

Court Decisions

Obligation of Commercial General Liability insurance carrier when the insured has settled a claim without notice to, or involvement of, insurance carrier. Travelers Property Casualty Company v. Stresscon Corporation. Supreme Court of Colorado. (2016), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

June 20, 2016

0

Court Decisions

Project Owner’s right to pursue claims directly against Engineer’s subconsultant. City of Whiting v. Whitney, Bailey, Cox & Magnani, LLC. United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana (2015), by Hugh Anderson

Read More

May 23, 2016

0

Legislation

Abandoned Mine Projects Need Better Engineering Expertise, Report Says, by Arthur Schwartz, NSPE Deputy Executive Director & General Counsel

Read More

May 23, 2016

0

Legislation

EPA Proposes PEs on Risk Management Teams by Arthur Schwartz, NSPE Deputy Executive Director & General Counsel

Read More

May 23, 2016

0

Legislation

Ohio PEs Gain ‘Good Samaritan’ Protections, by Arthur Schwartz, NSPE Deputy Executive Director & General Counsel

Read More

May 23, 2016

0

Legislation

Texas Board Expands Global Reach, Permits Early Exam Taking, by Arthur Schwartz, NSPE Deputy Executive Director & General Counsel

Read More

April 26, 2016

0

EJCDC

What is the intended scope of services contemplated for your firm as construction manager? by Coy M. Veach, P.E., CCM

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Ability of contractor to bring suit involving differing site conditions directly against geotechnical engineering firm, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Did the services of an engineer constitute an improvement to property, and thus entitle engineer to a construction (mechanic’s) lien? by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

EJCDC

Issue: Compliance with procedural requirements of performance bond, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Contractor’s Differing Site Condition claim on project with a Geotechnical Baseline Report, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

EJCDC

Bid responsiveness; correction of bid deficiency, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 23, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Engineer’s liability for failure of rain tank that it designed; reliance on manufacturer’s information; standard of care, and contractor’s responsibility, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 14, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Viability of supplier’s claim against design engineer, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 14, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Official immunity of engineering firm functioning as city engineer, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 14, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Interpretation of “substantial completion” with respect to a statute of repose, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 14, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Enforceability of limitation and waiver of liability clauses in a teaming agreement, after parties have entered into a subcontract, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

February 14, 2016

0

Court Decisions, EJCDC

Construction Manager as Advisor/Agent—liability for site safety, by Hugh Anderson

Read More

Page [tcb_pagination_current_page] of [tcb_pagination_total_pages]

First

Previous

Next

Last

ABOUT EJCDC

The Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC) is a joint venture of three major organizations of professional engineers. Since 1975, EJCDC has developed and updated fair and objective standard documents that represent the latest and best thinking in contractual relations between all parties involved in engineering design and construction projects.

LİNKS

  • Press Releases
  • Online Store
  • FAQs
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Opt-Out Policy

Social

Copyright 2026 EJCDC, all rights reserved.

EJCDC - Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}